The response of each campus to the protest have been quite different. A friend at Davis said her Chancellor sent an email essentially dismissing the protests while repeating the party line that the budget decisions are with the students best interest at heart. She encouraged students to call their department office if they found their classes were canceled. I chatted with a few physics grad students from UC Santa Cruz, where students have been occupying the Graduate Commons, and they reported that their Chancellor hasn't addressed the protests at all. Neither campus features articles about the protests on their websites.
The Berkeley response has been strikingly different and quite interesting. Prior to the walk out the campus community was sent an email by the Vice Chancellor informing students that the walk out was being held, that classes were in session unless professors had canceled them and that students might encounter picket lines but that they had a right to cross. In what seemed like an attempt at reassurance, he mentioned that in past strikes "picketers have been very committed to their point of view but respectful of the views of others." The tone was matter-of-fact and non-judgmental. September 25th the campus community received an email from the Chancellor and Vice Chancellor thanking us for our good behavior:
We would like to express our appreciation to our campus community - faculty, staff, students, and alumni - for the orderly, peaceful and effective way in which the September 24th budget protest actions were held on and around campus. While there was large participation in the day's actions, they occurred with minimal disruption to university operations and to our responsibilities to our students. Berkeley is proud of being the home of the Free Speech Movement and yesterday's protests exemplified the best of our tradition of effective civil action.Before we stop and analyze that email I'd like to point you to the link on Berkeley's website to a Berkeley News Center article about the protests (this is all UC Berkeley produced content), titled "Boisterous rally draws thousands to Sproul Plaza to vent anger at UC cut backs". The image I posted above headlines the article and they have a great slide show, giving a genuine view of the day's activities. I think the Chancellor's strategy is pretty clear. By making no negative statements about the protests but essentially ignoring a large source of the anger and frustration he is trying to control the message, steer the protests away from the UCOP and administration and not so subtly nudge it towards the state budget and Sacramento. On one hand it's a irksome to find members of the administration (although not UCOP) trying guide the grassroots movement which is ostensibly against them. On the other hand I completely agree with the direction they want us to go and think we have a much better case in Sacramento if we are working with the administration instead of against them. I have respect for Birgeneau, and while he has been less than impressive in this 'crisis', I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. Railing against Yudof and the Regents (who at this point I have practically no respect for, but I'll get to that later) might feel good but it's not going to change anything. Yudof was appointed by the Regents and the Regents are appointed by the Governor so there is little hope that getting rid of him will bring in anyone better. Once you consider that the Regents, generally business people and layers, are major campaign donors to the Governor with little to no education experience and often no connection to the UC system, you realize that Sacramento is where we have to focus our efforts.
Your actions have sent a clear and important message to our legislators and to the California public that the State's disinvestment in public higher education must stop. We hope that we can build on these actions together to continue to inform the public and the State legislature that cuts to the University of California undermine our State's future and that it is in the interests of all of the people of our great State of California to reinvest in public higher education.
Robert J. Birgeneau
Chancellor
George W. Breslauer
Executive Vice-Chancellor & Provost
The root of California's budget problems is Proposition 13, an constitutional amendment in the 70s which capped property tax values at 1% of the purchase price of a house and at the same time required a 2/3rds vote to raise taxes and pass budgets. The measure decimated the state's revenue sources and holds the budget hostage to the minority. The ideal situation would be to call a constitutional convention to rewrite the entire document, which is extremely flawed (remember Prop 8). While some are seriously proposing a convention, it might be practically impossible accrue sufficient political will to hold one. A likely and timely solution, however, is to amend the constitution to remove the 2/3rd requirement. It only takes a simple majority to effect that change through a ballot proposition. Berkeley Professor George Lakoff submitted one to the Attorney General and we could vote on it in next election.
Now I'll get back to why I've lost respect for Yudof. As I mentioned before, watching his address to the UC community about the cuts, left me with a picture of a man on the defensive with no inclination to fight for the core values of the University. After reading this appalling interview in the New York Times (dated 9/24/09!), I am convinced he does not care at all for the remarkable system he is captaining. He actually said, "being president of the University of California is like being manager of a cemetery: there are many people under you, but no one is listening". Clearly he does not feel like he is responsible to the University community if he is willing to say that. So, I have no respect for him, but, as I mentioned above, I don't think attacking him will be fruitful. Of course we shouldn't keep quiet as he pursues a course of privatization however we need to fix the underlying cause so the University, and the rest of the state educational system, can reverse its downward slide.
So, to Sacramento we must go, however the legislature won't be in session again until January so we risk loosing momentum. Several speakers during the rally called for the UCs to band together with the CSUs, community colleges and K-12 schools to demand the State make education a priority. If we can coordinate across these groups I think we have a really chance for change. I'll keep posting as I hear about more action, and if you are a California resident and haven't emailed your representatives, please do so now! If you are a Berkeley staff, student, faculty, parent or concerned citizen you can sign up to help with the Berkeley Alliance Against the Cuts.